20-07-2008, 04:54 PM
Hi..
i'm sure you would most likely have considered it before or someone might have mentioned this idea before but ofcourse i am gonna suggest it anyway.
Rolling or potential of rolling will always exist whether its a single stake, bap stake but surely its possible to reduce the risk of rolling for BAP's.
For example, there have been quite a few 50x4.4 buying (well only a couple) bap's going or recently and this is where the idea will work best.
In general no1 will need more than 10 buyins on any 1 day so when a bap is actually filled up why not have all the funds ships to stake a shark and stake a shark will then ship the required amount of buyins or a daily or a few days basis.
I understand that problems may arise from this as its alot of hassle especially for the admin and work.. but some refinement is obviously needed to my suggestion on wot works best. And i understand it will not reduce the risk for events with high buyin's but in general.. no1 really is gonna get staked for big buyin events unless they are trustworthy and so forth..
This idea still wont protect against those that roll after a big win and decide not to ship the funds but i still think for games whether its ring or tournaments with many buyin's that it might be worth doing this with. Also you can set a certain amount of $ before needing to do.. i mean i understand that if its simply a 10x$1.2 or 20x$1.2 bap then the need for such isnt needed but i do feel once baps go over several hundred $$ and have many games involved it might be worth considering.
its just a suggestion and therefore all thoughts and opionions are welcome here.. but it was just a spur of a moment thought which i am sure must have come up before.. but i didnt really try to look that far back to find a thread with it in.
i'm sure you would most likely have considered it before or someone might have mentioned this idea before but ofcourse i am gonna suggest it anyway.
Rolling or potential of rolling will always exist whether its a single stake, bap stake but surely its possible to reduce the risk of rolling for BAP's.
For example, there have been quite a few 50x4.4 buying (well only a couple) bap's going or recently and this is where the idea will work best.
In general no1 will need more than 10 buyins on any 1 day so when a bap is actually filled up why not have all the funds ships to stake a shark and stake a shark will then ship the required amount of buyins or a daily or a few days basis.
I understand that problems may arise from this as its alot of hassle especially for the admin and work.. but some refinement is obviously needed to my suggestion on wot works best. And i understand it will not reduce the risk for events with high buyin's but in general.. no1 really is gonna get staked for big buyin events unless they are trustworthy and so forth..
This idea still wont protect against those that roll after a big win and decide not to ship the funds but i still think for games whether its ring or tournaments with many buyin's that it might be worth doing this with. Also you can set a certain amount of $ before needing to do.. i mean i understand that if its simply a 10x$1.2 or 20x$1.2 bap then the need for such isnt needed but i do feel once baps go over several hundred $$ and have many games involved it might be worth considering.
its just a suggestion and therefore all thoughts and opionions are welcome here.. but it was just a spur of a moment thought which i am sure must have come up before.. but i didnt really try to look that far back to find a thread with it in.